ART-CLAIX-002
Decision: NEEDS_MORE_EVIDENCE
Claix preserved the current-state, provenance and confirmed-sales gaps; retained the non-commercial authority ceiling; and required no manual explanation.
Independent-consumption evidence
Proof means showing the result—and the defect.
Claix consumed two frozen GAIP packets without a private GAIP explanation. The tests assess whether an independent agent can parse the packet, preserve uncertainty and authority limits, avoid unsupported inference and return a bounded decision.
Results
BROKER-CLAIX-002
Decision: NEEDS_MORE_EVIDENCE
The original automated record remains 7/8. Governed review found substantive evidence comprehension because demand_evidence represented the frozen opportunity concept without reversing its meaning. A prospective scorer correction accepted only predeclared equivalents; the later retained run records 8/8.
What both tests demonstrated
Machine consumption
The responses normalized against the frozen common schema and echoed the expected input hash.
Boundary retention
Both responses kept material uncertainty, returned NEEDS_MORE_EVIDENCE and preserved read-only, non-transactional limits.
No private explanation
Both returned manual_gaip_explanation_required: false and reported no unsupported inference.
What this does not prove
evidence correctness; market demand or adoption; commercial value; production readiness; broad interoperability; brokerage, payment, wallet, signing or transaction authority; Suede interoperability.
Suede was not run. These are two bounded Claix tests, not evidence of organic discovery, repeat adoption, evidence correctness or permission to transact.